Charles Hess

iPubCloud Blog Contributor

Charles Hess

iPubCloud Blog Contributor

David Brooks Article And Len Swidler’s Comment

by | Mar 15, 2018 | Dealing With Polarization, Dialogue

David Brooks; The New York Times – Oct 23, 2017 I’ve had a series of experiences over the past two weeks that leave the impression that everybody on earth is having the same conversation: How do you engage with fanatics? First, I was at a Washington Nationals game when a Trump supporter in the row in front of me unleashed a 10-minute profanity-strewn tirade at me, my wife and son. Then I went to the University at North Carolina at Asheville and watched some students engage in a heartfelt discussion over whether extremists should be allowed to speak on campus. Then I went to Madrid, where a number of Spaniards told me that the leaders of the Catalan independence movement were so radical there was no way to reason with them. Then I went to London where I was with pro-Brexit and anti-Brexit activists trying to have a civil conversation with one another. Over the course of these experiences I’ve been rehearsing all the reasons to think that it’s useless to try to have a civil conversation with a zealot, that you’ve just got to exile them, or confront them with equal and opposite force. For example, you can’t have a civil conversation with people who are intent on destroying the rules that govern conversation itself. It’s fruitless to engage with people who are impervious to facts. There are some ideas — like racism — that are so noxious they deserve no recognition in any decent community. There are some people who are so consumed by enmity that the only thing they deserve is contempt…And yet the more I think about it, the more I agree with the argument Yale Law professor Stephen L. Carter made in his 1998 book “Civility.” The only way to confront fanaticism is with love, he said. Ask the fanatics genuine questions. Paraphrase what they say so they know they’ve been heard. Show some ultimate care for their destiny and soul even if you detest the words that come out of their mouths. You engage fanaticism with love, first, for your own sake. If you succumb to the natural temptation to greet this anger with your own anger, you’ll just spend your days consumed by bitterness and revenge. You’ll be a worse person in all ways…Second, you greet a fanatic with compassionate listening as a way to offer an unearned gift to the fanatic himself. These days, most fanatics are not Nietzschean supermen. They are lonely and sad, their fanaticism emerging from wounded pride, a feeling of not being seen. If you make these people feel heard, maybe in some small way you’ll address the emotional bile that is at the root of their political posture…Finally, it’s best to greet fanaticism with love for the sake of the country. As Carter points out, the best abolitionists restrained their natural hatred of slaveholders because they thought the reform of manners and the abolition of slavery were part of the same cause — to restore the dignity of every human being. We all swim in a common pool… Civility, Carter writes, “is the sum of the many sacrifices we are called to make for the sake of living together.” You don’t have to like someone to love him. All you have to do is try to imitate Martin Luther King, who thrust his love into his enemies’ hearts in a way that was aggressive, remorseless and destabilizing. Now I confess I didn’t respond to the Trump guy at the ballgame with all the noble sentiments I’ve put in this column. But I’m sure I’ll have a chance to do better soon. Doing the right thing in these bitter times is hard, but the answer isn’t that complicated. Dr. Len Swidler’s Comment: Basically,

  • you try to restate the other person’s position as positively, or at least as neutrally, as you can, and ask for confirmation or correction of your mirroring his/her position.
  • You ask questions as to a) the sources of their information, and b) the implications of their position in situations x, y, z.

Perhaps, he/she will lose their reason-blinding anger. However, it may take a long time—perhaps this gave rise to the Hindu/Buddhist doctrine of Karma/Reincarnation because one lifetime often is not long enough. – Len Swidler

Written By

Charles Hess

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin a neque venenatis, ullamcorper est ut, sollicitudin dolor. Pellentesque a aliquet magna, sed iaculis enim. Maecenas rhoncus semper dignissim. Nam quis auctor elit. Nulla nunc dui, eleifend nec massa sagittis, aliquet volutpat lectus.

Other Recent Posts

Sandy Mayer’s Holiday Recommendations

Sandy’s 2019 Holiday Must Haves!

Learn more about our COO Sandy Mayer in her holiday recommendation post. We learn a little bit about who Sandy is in addition to a wonderfully diverse and detailed holiday recommendation list with logical points. See everything from the new Amazon Fire Stick to non-denominational holiday cards on her list of recommendations.

read more

Announcing Buddhism Made Plain

Updates & Announcements iPubCloud Team Updates & Announcements iPubCloud Team Are you a Christian or Jew who has wondered what Buddhism is all about? This book will not only answer that question but will also help you learn to relax and show you why meditation is not...

read more
iPub Global Connection is an online community of fellow thinkers, writers, and readers. We hope it will become your favorite place to shop for books and other items you use in your daily life, including music, gifts, tools, and clothes – all that Amazon and other distribution sites offer.
Translate »